It doesn't say anything such thing. As a matter of fact even says that Bush resisted at first after the Sept. 11th attacks.
Page 3 Para 4 "But despite the aggressive language, there was no sign that he had accepted the logic of a pre-emptive strike against Saddam. After Sept. 11, he initially resisted making Iraq an early target of American might. Wolfowitz, says a Republican lawmaker, "was like a parrot bringing [Iraq] up all the time. It was getting on the President's nerves." At one point in the Camp David meeting after Sept. 11, Wolfowitz tried to persuade Bush to back a scheme to lop off the southern part of Iraq, including Basra, its third largest city, and some important oil fields. That went nowhere. And no matter how hard the intelligence agencies looked, they couldn't come up with a link between Saddam and Sept. 11 that might persuade Bush of the virtues of an early strike." Tim -----Original Message----- From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:32 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Bush decided to "take out Saddam" in March Lon Lentz wrote: > Logical fallacy. The story has nothing to do with whether there is or >isn't Al Qaeda involvement. > > > I see no logical fallacy. It states that this was a goal before 9/11/2001. Pres. Bush saw a way to move on Iraq under the guise of the war on terrorism. Iraq has not been exposed to have committed any terroristic acts, therefore the administration had to make a link from Iraq to a terrorist organization. Al Caeda just happened to be on the public's mind at the time. > Besides, it's a war on Terrorism, not just Al Qaeda. And the "Regime >Change" policy for Iraq started under Bill "That Pantload" Clinton....my >fingers feel dirty just for typing his name.....<shudder> > > > According to the Nightline story <url:http://abcnews.go.com/sections/nightline/DailyNews/pnac_030310.html>, it was started by a conservative group during Clinton's presidency of which 10 are now part of the current administration. As to Clinton, I'm not sure which is worse, a president who screws a few other women other than his wife, or a president who screws a lot more people out of money because of his stock sell off. :) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
