Yes. Bush thinks of Bush first, Bush second, Bush third, America fourth and everyone else, even America's long term allies, last. He'll be up for election and he'll win. Look at his actions in the middle east (not Iraq):
U.S. threatened sanctions if Israel blocked 'Roadmap' http://216.26.163.62/2003/ss_israel_05_27.html "The White House doesn't regard the roadmap merely as foreign policy. It sees the roadmap as a major element toward the reelection of the president." There's also the other side of the bush first coin which is this: Syria Grants American Oil Companies Exclusive Rights to Sector of Northeastern Syria http://www.sana.org/english/headlines/31-5/oil_companies.htm Note how Syria isn't in the news anymore as a 'bad guy'. Good for America or good for Bush allies who will help him get in again? And let's be honest. Who has a chance against him? There's no one with the clout, bucks, pull and balls (let alone bullet proof vest) to go against Bush and win. > you think he will be re-elected? > > Michael Dinowitz writes: > > > Unfortunately, it will be more of the same. The whole road map being forced > > (illegally) down Israel's throat is being done for one reason and one reason > > only; re-election. We'll have more Bush, more Cheney, more Powell, more of the > > same. > > > > > > > If n fact he is just another mouth piece, no. Last thing we need is more of > > > the same. > > > > > > Dana > > > > > > Michael Dinowitz writes: > > > > > > > His backstory once made him very attractive to me as a candidate. Problem > > is, > > > > he's become just another mouthpiece for the powers that be and is just not > > > > someone I'd vote for anymore. > > > > Just as an aside, let me throw this into the mix. > > > > > > http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/teachers/lessonplans/iraq/powelldoctrine_short > > > > .html > > > > His military doctrine about when and how to use force. Seems he feel it only > > > > applies to himself, not to others.... > > > > > > > > > I dunno... I could conceive of voting for him and I am sure as hell not a > > > > > Republican. This may change if he appears to have been dishonest. I also > > > > > wondered if he wasn't the source for that story. > > > > > > > > > > Dana > > > > > > > > > > jon hall writes: > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps it may appear so on the surface, but I really can't agree. The > > > > > > administration want's Powell to be a "yes man", but obviously he > > > > > > doesn't like it. Cheney is the one who originally wrote the BS in the > > > > > > first place. > > > > > > Much has been made about Powell disagreeing with the administration on > > > > > > a lot of issues. The problem is that he is outnumbered in the White > > > > > > House with Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Rice usually lining up against him. > > > > > > > > > > > > My take is the almost extreme opposite of this somehow being a sign of > > > > > > weakness on Powell's part. I see it as a sign of strength that he > > > > > > disagree's so much with the party line, but refuses to try and make it > > > > > > an issue of right and wrong in the public eye. Especially since the > > > > > > American voter only really cares about the truth when their party > > > > > > doesn't have the White House. I doubt Powell would have gained more > > > > > > Democratic supporters than Republican supporters he would have lost if > > > > > > he refused to go along with the White House. > > > > > > > > > > > > When it comes down to it, the first black man to have a chance of > > > > > > becoming President has more important things to worry about than > > > > > > whether or not one reason to go to war with Iraq is better than > > > > > > another. > > > > > > He has a strong support base on the right currently and can't > > > > > > let the media screw up his image by painting him as a maverick, and I > > > > > > can't help but draw a parallel between David Palmer in the show 24, > > > > > > and Powell. Playing ball now will go a long way in the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > jon > > > > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > Monday, June 2, 2003, 10:24:00 PM, you wrote: > > > > > > MD> Powell, who I once thought I respected, is nothing more than a "yes > > man" > > > > for > > > > > > MD> Bush and the forces in the state department. He is definitely not in > > > > charge of > > > > > > MD> anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On the evening of February 1, two dozen American officials gathered > > in a > > > > > > MD> spacious conference room at the Central Intelligence Agency in > > Langley, > > > > Va. The > > > > > > MD> time had come to make the public case for war against Iraq. For six > > > > hours that > > > > > > MD> Saturday, the men and women of the Bush administration argued about > > what > > > > > > MD> Secretary of State Colin Powell should--and should not--say at the > > > > United > > > > > > MD> Nations Security Council four days later. Not all the secret > > > > intelligence about > > > > > > MD> Saddam Hussein's misdeeds, they found, stood up to close scrutiny. > > At > > > > one point > > > > > > MD> during the rehearsal, Powell tossed several pages in the air. "I'm > > not > > > > reading > > > > > > MD> this," he declared. "This is bulls- - -." > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/030609/usnews/9intell.htm > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Host with the leader in ColdFusion hosting. Voted #1 ColdFusion host by CF Developers. Offering shared and dedicated hosting options. www.cfxhosting.com/default.cfm?redirect=10481 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
