by the way I just got around to this link and its unavailable ? what did it say?
Michael Dinowitz writes: > His backstory once made him very attractive to me as a candidate. Problem is, > he's become just another mouthpiece for the powers that be and is just not > someone I'd vote for anymore. > Just as an aside, let me throw this into the mix. > http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/teachers/lessonplans/iraq/powelldoctrine_short > .html > His military doctrine about when and how to use force. Seems he feel it only > applies to himself, not to others.... > > > I dunno... I could conceive of voting for him and I am sure as hell not a > > Republican. This may change if he appears to have been dishonest. I also > > wondered if he wasn't the source for that story. > > > > Dana > > > > jon hall writes: > > > > > Perhaps it may appear so on the surface, but I really can't agree. The > > > administration want's Powell to be a "yes man", but obviously he > > > doesn't like it. Cheney is the one who originally wrote the BS in the > > > first place. > > > Much has been made about Powell disagreeing with the administration on > > > a lot of issues. The problem is that he is outnumbered in the White > > > House with Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Rice usually lining up against him. > > > > > > My take is the almost extreme opposite of this somehow being a sign of > > > weakness on Powell's part. I see it as a sign of strength that he > > > disagree's so much with the party line, but refuses to try and make it > > > an issue of right and wrong in the public eye. Especially since the > > > American voter only really cares about the truth when their party > > > doesn't have the White House. I doubt Powell would have gained more > > > Democratic supporters than Republican supporters he would have lost if > > > he refused to go along with the White House. > > > > > > When it comes down to it, the first black man to have a chance of > > > becoming President has more important things to worry about than > > > whether or not one reason to go to war with Iraq is better than > > > another. > > > He has a strong support base on the right currently and can't > > > let the media screw up his image by painting him as a maverick, and I > > > can't help but draw a parallel between David Palmer in the show 24, > > > and Powell. Playing ball now will go a long way in the future. > > > > > > -- > > > jon > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Monday, June 2, 2003, 10:24:00 PM, you wrote: > > > MD> Powell, who I once thought I respected, is nothing more than a "yes man" > for > > > MD> Bush and the forces in the state department. He is definitely not in > charge of > > > MD> anything. > > > > > > > > > >> On the evening of February 1, two dozen American officials gathered in a > > > MD> spacious conference room at the Central Intelligence Agency in Langley, > Va. The > > > MD> time had come to make the public case for war against Iraq. For six > hours that > > > MD> Saturday, the men and women of the Bush administration argued about what > > > MD> Secretary of State Colin Powell should--and should not--say at the > United > > > MD> Nations Security Council four days later. Not all the secret > intelligence about > > > MD> Saddam Hussein's misdeeds, they found, stood up to close scrutiny. At > one point > > > MD> during the rehearsal, Powell tossed several pages in the air. "I'm not > reading > > > MD> this," he declared. "This is bulls- - -." > > > >> > > > >> http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/030609/usnews/9intell.htm > > > >> > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
