I agree Nick, it was wrong. I am just saying it is understandable. But it definitely has to go and I definitely do not advocate trusting this administration.
Dana > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 3:32 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: well now > > > > > > I am in no way saying the patriot act is a good thing. > > However the responsibility still lies in the hands of the > > people who voted for it. I don't care if they were not > > allowed to amend it. They should not have voted for it. > > > > They should have read the bill, I read every contract I sign, > > because I want to know what I am signing. > > > > I read each ballot in the voting booth on Election Day, and I > > make sure to understand what I am voting on before I get there. > > > > If you have use a filibuster to force the issue then that is > > what you have to do. At times like this sometimes you may > > have to sacrifice your political career to make sure America > > is not treading down the wrong path. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:05 PM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: Re: well now > > > > > > ok, so just going by those numbers we are talking about under Bush > > > they are going to get 50% more in half the time? I am still > > interested > > > in the circumstances behind the original award, though. > > Clinton wasn't > > > much on military or foreign policy. > > > > > > I don't think you read enough of the description. He says > > they debated > > > one bill and then suddently there was a differnt bill and they were > > > told they could not amend it and it was required for the > > safety of a > > > US under attack by a foreign power. Remember this was two > > weeks after > > > 9/11... > > > > > > And surely I am misunderstanding you...you seem to be saying he is > > > whining. Do you actually think the Patriot Act is a good thing? > > > > > > In any event this leads me to be very skeptical of claims > > that there > > > is no point in reviewng the Halliburton contract and > > putting it up for > > > bid because it would be a waste of time. > > > > > > Dana > > > > > > Dana > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
