ok, if you define the job to include "must be able to speak to non-IT
people" then I suppose you are right. I certainly think the liberal arts
are valuable - the interdisciplinary honors classes I "wasted" time on in
college were some of the best time I ever invested -- but if you really had
to define a core skill for a code it would be proven ability to code, no?

Dana

Josh Remus writes:

> As far as I'm concerned, there's no coder-job that I can justify someone who
> cannot communicate these days.
>
> If you have a well-defined hierarchy with enough people (IE: you have
> several coder-types underneath a manager who HAS communication skills &
> techie-skills), perhaps people with poor communication skills can still be
> excellent coders, as long as they never have to get beyond that level OR
> speak coherently to someone other than their manager.
>
> I think the days of the stereotypical "IT-type hidden in the dark room" are
> over.  Or are beginning to be over.  I think a well-rounded education that
> includes a significant portion of liberal arts exposes a person on HOW to
> learn anything & communicate effectively, which in the long-run makes a more
> adaptive & effective employee.
>
> But that's just my opinion.  And I certainly know CS-types who CAN
> communicate effectively.  I just know plenty who can't.  A good liberal arts
> major can learn ANYTHING.  A significantly-focused engineering-type degree
> teaches the person ONE thing very well, but nothing else.
>
> My dos pesos.
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:12 AM
>   To: CF-Community
>   Subject: Re: CF Salary Range
>
>
>   to personal development. but to ability ot do the job?
>
>   Dana
>
>   Josh Remus writes:
>
>   > I have a great degree in General Studies.  I was originally a music
> major,
>   > switched to CS, dropped out of school, and that was the only degree I
> could
>   > go back and complete in reasonable time.
>   >
>   > However - having said that - except for specific engineering-type jobs
>   > (which I don't considering cf-coding, in general), I think a
> well-rounded
>   > humanities/arts degree means much more than a CS one.
>   >
>   > Not to start a flame war.  I know too many CS/CE-types who have no
> ability
>   > to communicate in any medium.
>   >   -----Original Message-----
>   >   From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   >   Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:49 AM
>   >   To: CF-Community
>   >   Subject: Re: CF Salary Range
>   >
>   >
>   >   I would like to know how many people on the list actually have a
> CS/MIS
>   > degree.
>   >
>   >   I do.
>   >
>   >   - Matt Small
>   >     ----- Original Message -----
>   >     From: Dana Tierney
>   >     To: CF-Community
>   >     Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:37 AM
>   >     Subject: Re: CF Salary Range
>   >
>   >
>   >     OK, I will concede that the SQl class was helpful. And despite the
> focus
>   > on
>   >     PASCAL in comp sci 1 and 2, I learned a lot about programming per
> se.
>   > But
>   >     whether I could have learned the same material without being present
> in
>   > a
>   >     classroom from 10 to 11 on Tuesdays and Thursdays is what I am
>   > questioning.
>   >     I think so...
>   >
>   >     Dana
>   >
>   >     Dana
>   >
>   >     Jeffry Houser writes:
>   >
>   >     >   If the classes you took focused on a language, I can understand
> how
>   > they
>   >     > may not be applicable to web development.  But, a good curriculum
> will
>   >     > concentrate on theory.  I apply programming theory every day.  I'm
>   > sure
>   >     > that many will agree that to get anywhere when building dynamic
> web
>   > pages
>   >     > you need to know something about database design.
>   >     >
>   >     > At 01:05 AM 10/1/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>   >     > >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>
>

[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to