it seems to me that she is somewhat responsive, but that is besides the
point. she and her husband discussed this and she said she did not want to
live like that.

-----Original Message-----
From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:13 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: This is .....

btw...here's the other side of the tale.

Take a good look.

"
<http://www.friendsofterri.org/how's%20that%20cold.rm>
http://www.friendsofterri.org/how's%20that%20cold.rm
<http://www.friendsofterri.org/how's%20that%20cold.rm>

<http://www.friendsofterri.org/Terri%20Big%20Eyes.rm>
http://www.friendsofterri.org/Terri%20Big%20Eyes.rm
<http://www.friendsofterri.org/Terri%20Big%20Eyes.rm>

They removed her feeding tube, planning on starving her to death.

She was denied therapy to make the minimal steps required for her to eat
normally.

"

-Gel

-----Original Message-----
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:02 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: This is .....

....the most assinine thing ever. Why the f$%^ is the state legislature
getting involved? The woman told her husband she didnt want to live like
this. Man this pisses me off. It's nice to know that if my wife and I
discuss how we do or do not want to live when comatic or a vegetable,
that
our wishes mean nothing. God damn why cant people just let those who are
deciding about their OWN lives decide? I

http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/10/21/coma.woman/index.html
<http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/10/21/coma.woman/index.html>
<http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/10/21/coma.woman/index.html>

  _____  

  _____  


[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to