How do we know that Brob didn't mean "happy" when he said gay?

Really...  the only person who cares when you get offended is yourself.

- Matt Small
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Marlon Moyer
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 9:42 AM
  Subject: RE: Political Correctness

  I f&cking believe that you should be able to use any f&cking word you want
  to.  I mean, what the f&ck.  How is this word f&cking offensive to anybody.
  It just f&cking kills me when people react in a f&cking ignorant way about
  language, that somehow just the sound of one f&cking word could be so
  offensive.  Don't people understand that it's the f&cking meaning behind the
  word and how it's used in context.  If you're not f&cking intelligent enough
  to understand this simple fact, then f&ck off!  Oh wait, that last use was
  offensive....

  --
  marlon

  "And Bobby you are right, I am being selfish, but the last time I checked,
  we don't have a whole lot of songs that feature the cowbell!"

  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: Harkins, Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 8:33 AM
  > To: CF-Community
  > Subject: RE: Political Correctness
  >
  > Ray,
  >
  > It's true that language is simply what people say, but it's not a question
  > of "shoulds". It's a question of your objective when speaking to someone.
  > If
  > you want to gain their trust or respect then you use a different language
  > than if you wish to wound. Language is as language does.
  > Personally I don't believe you can ever be too careful with language. A
  > careless word can destroy years of effort.
  > As for respect, its an article of faith for me (though not always an easy
  > one) that everyone deserves it, even when they don't appear to.
  >
  > regards,
  > Patrick
  >
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: Raymond Camden
  > Subject: RE: Political Correctness
  >
  >
  > Assuming we all want to be nice and not hurt anyones feelings, which is
  > not
  > true of course, but lets pretend, why should a minority group get to
  > define
  > meanings of words? If the majority says that X implies Y but the minority
  > disagrees, well, isn't that too bad? Sure X may have meant something bad
  > in
  > the past, but language is fluid, it changes.
  >
  > -rc
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to