religious biases down my throat. And for all intents and purposes this
proposed amendment does exactly that. Moreover it contradicts the equal
protection clause as well. Welcome to the latest in the Republican wedge
issues.
larry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. Hatton Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 11:11 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: New Topic: 28th Amendment?
>
>
> Okay, I just finished listening to the President announce
> that he is going to push for a Constitutional Amendment
> definition marriage (as legally recognized by the Government)
> as a union between one man and one woman.
>
> The show I'm listening to (Mark Davis on WBAP Dallas/Ft
> Worth) made a very good point - this is not going to loose
> Bush any support. If people are angry at him for this
> decision, they already didn't like him.
>
> Should be an interesting fight. I don't know if it will
> actually pass or not. I think that it's important to point
> out that he is talking about legally recognized marriages and
> points out that States should come up with some alternative
> for same sex couples that does not redefine marriage.
>
> Who wants popcorn? This is going to be a fun show!
>
> Hatton
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.572 / Virus Database: 362 - Release Date: 1/27/2004
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
