As I see it, marriage imparts many government goodies, such as favorable tax
status before the IRS, Legal, as in inheritance, consent to medical procedures,
joint tenancy such as homestead exemptions held jointly, and many more.
The proposed civil unions do not impart these protections and perhaps that is
the reason the movement is opposed.  That is aside from religious reasons.

For example if 1 1/2 million gays or others entered into same-sex marriage, what
effect would that have on the millions of us who opt for what is known as
traditional marriage?
Would we lose something?  Would it be any different for us?  If so, how?


  > Disappointing actually. I really dislike it when others try
  > to shove their religious biases down my throat. And for all
  > intents and purposes this proposed amendment does exactly
  > that. Moreover it contradicts the equal protection clause as
  > well. Welcome to the latest in the Republican wedge issues.

  While I'll agree that there are some serious considerations and issues to
  look at with this proposal.  It should also be pointed out that this is
  simply an announcement of intent, not a guarantee of passage.  When it comes
  to changing the US Constitution there is a whole slew of hoops that the
  amendment has to run through before it is enacted.

  The problem that is happening right now is the fact that we have a Full
  Faith and Credit clause in the Constitution (Article 4) that means that what
  is recognized as a marriage in one state must be accepted as a marriage (for
  *legal* purposes) in all states.  The other thing that I heard during his
  announcement was that he suggested that states come up with some alternative
  to marriage (civil unions, support of same sex couples in taxing and
  benefits) without redefining marriage.

  We're not talking about whether or not two men or two women should have the
  ability to commit themselves to each other before God, family and friends.
  It is a question of whether or not the Government must see these same sex
  couples at the same level as they do heterosexual couples when it comes to
  legal issues.

  Hatton
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to