What a flip-flop!.. During the 2000 election, Bush and Chenney said it was
a states issue, not federal.
At 08:10 AM 2/24/2004, you wrote:
>Okay, I just finished listening to the President announce that he is going
>to push for a Constitutional Amendment definition marriage (as legally
>recognized by the Government) as a union between one man and one woman.
>
>The show I'm listening to (Mark Davis on WBAP Dallas/Ft Worth) made a very
>good point - this is not going to loose Bush any support. If people are
>angry at him for this decision, they already didn't like him.
>
>Should be an interesting fight. I don't know if it will actually pass or
>not. I think that it's important to point out that he is talking about
>legally recognized marriages and points out that States should come up with
>some alternative for same sex couples that does not redefine marriage.
>
>Who wants popcorn? This is going to be a fun show!
>
>Hatton
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.572 / Virus Database: 362 - Release Date: 1/27/2004
>
>----------
>[
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
