your point. Personally if I was a person who committed a bunch of crimes,
and then was claiming I was at war with my country, I would expect to be
treated less evenly than if it was a pure crimminal deal. I dont recall
anyone saying, boy I wish I could have faced a miltary tribunal instead of
that testy jury that convicted me.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 12:20 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: News bias
So all I have to do is kill people, rob banks, blow stuff up and when I'm
caught claim it's all part of a war? "I'm from the CF milita, we're at war
with you". That's a cop-out. Where's the limit?
> As to the Malvo thing, I say no. That was a crimminal act. If it was found
> that he was a member of an insurgent group, or a member of some miltia
then
> I would say warfare. Regardless of what it is called, the US can deal with
> him however it sees fit.
>
> Killing civilians is horrible. It is deplorable. It is grotesque to the
> extreme. And it is effective, and will continue to be a part of every type
> of warfare until mankind can evolve past this need to end all
disagreements
> with fists, bullets and bombs.
>
>
>
>
>
>
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
