side of Israel and the lack of it on the side of the Palestinians, the moral
justification is being skewed by news agencies by their use of language.
A terrorist is a bad guy, a militant can be seen as a good guy. Blow up
innocents in Israel, your not a bad guy (terrorist). Blow up innocents in
Spain, your a bad guy (terrorist). Terrorist is a word loaded with moral
justification and the news agencies are playing arbitrator of who is moral
or not.
> While I understand the "win by any means" mindset (it was how I too was
> taught), I think restraint gives credence to moral justification for the
> violence in the first place. It is what is refered to as "honor on the
> battlefield".
>
> Is it better to die with honor or to win? And what is winning?
>
> -Kevin
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
