@martinjuckes My point is that we are a standard, and we need to use standards language. Many of our problems in this and other areas are the direct result of **not** using such language.
As an example, I do not read the statement in the NUG as being prescriptive or proscriptive. It is descriptive. We need to start using the sorts of language needed to make this clear. Our past lack of specificity is a defect. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/174#issuecomment-594069962 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
