Wow, @twhiteaker, that esri_pe_string is a real find. When we first defined EASE-Grid and realized ESRI did that, (assumed WGS84) there was no remedy other than reprojecting to wgs84-based projection, which has always been a pain and was one of the motivators for defining EASE-Grid 2.0.
I do realize that including all that redundant information is fraught with risk for all the reasons people on this thread and related ones mentioned. In an ideal world we should only need to include this kind of technical information once, and not repeat ourselves. I do applaud those who are striving to create a more ideal mapping software world. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/278#issuecomment-645054574 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
