Editorial suggestion: In the statement, ``` To ensure that the results of the coordinate reconstitution process are reproducible and of predictable accuracy, the creator of the compressed dataset may specify the floating-point arithmetic precision to be used in the interpolation method computations by .... ``` I think we should replace "reproducible and of predictable accuracy" with "reproducible with sufficient accuracy" (or something similar). The accuracy might for some algorithms be improved using a higher precision than specified by the `computational_precision` attribute, but such higher accuracy might be considered unwarranted for a given dataset. So the accuracy really isn't totally determined by the attribute (i.e., it isn't predictable) because the user is free to perform the calculation at a higher precision.
(Hope this is correct and understandable.) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/327*issuecomment-866366247__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!giJ39YFIP5U24kb7fTEtz4MaVEwFlMKsiQC5-_rMLb7Sjsi3CDwVge-gaJ2pZbOSCdI0OgYfIS0$ This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
