FYI: Piece of S**t

--
Scott Van Vliet
Sempra Energy
555 W. 5th St., 21st Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Tel > 213.244.5205
Email > [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Hello Stupid, and welcome to your crappy computer."
- Strong Bad, HomestarRunner.com






> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 12:19 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5
> 
> 
> cfhttp is a pos? Whats a pos?
> 
> At 02:51 PM 26/07/02 -0400, you wrote:
> >In two of my major apps that I've been able to test, both
> >have seen about a 100% increase in page execution with a single user.
> >Even with debugging on. I'm quite happy with the speed.
> >My main beef with MX is the broken COM support, which means that I
> >can't use MSXML, which I use all the time since cfhttp is a 
> pos. So we
> >can't upgrade any servers, and have to wait for a new server to come
> >online to install MX on.
> >
> >--
> >  Jon
> >  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >Friday, July 26, 2002, 2:18:39 PM, you wrote:
> >twrc> I'm actually wondering if some of the complaint about 
> the 'speed' 
> >issue is
> >twrc> what people are noticing when in development.  Let's 
> face it, the 
> >debugger
> >twrc> application is a hog for whatever it's doing.  Every 
> now and then I 
> >turn
> >twrc> off the debugger so I can get the real speed of what 
> the end user is 
> >going
> >twrc> to see and I think people are forgetting about that.
> >
> >twrc> In a production environment, debugging shouldn't be 
> turned on (in a
> >twrc> perfect world, with the perfect qa environment, etc.). 
>  Not all of 
> >us are
> >twrc> disappointed with CFMX, but then... I dunno, not all 
> of us is writing
> >twrc> brand new code either.
> >
> >twrc> ~Todd
> >
> >
> >twrc> On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Jesse Noller wrote:
> >
> > >> The reason why you don't run into this with PHP, ASP, and JSP 
> > (actually, I avoid JSP) is that they are interpreted 
> languages, like the 
> > current CFML is sort of, and the old CF was.
> > >>
> > >> You do get this with Perl. Perl requires compilation 
> time. Actually, 
> > some of the advanced CPAN/Perl/PHP stuff I've done lately 
> does require an 
> > App compilation.
> > >>
> > >> The fact of the matter is that while we provide you with 
> CFML, a RAD 
> > development language, which is then interpreted into Java 
> bytecode, we 
> > have not left the RAD ideal, in "my" mind, RAD is a
> > >> style of language that allows you rapid development, NOT 
> taking into 
> > account the deployment of application, rather, I don't 
> believe that we 
> > "left" RAD behind due to JIT time.
> > >>
> > >> While it would be optimal to have all the benefits that 
> we've garnered 
> > with CFMX without the compile time, I believe the benefits 
> we have gained 
> > outweigh the extra 10-20 seconds it takes to view a
> > >> source page. You'd get the same thing with Perl.
> > >>
> > >> The CFML language is maturing, that's a fact of life. One of the 
> > biggest limitations facing "RAD" languages such as PHP, or 
> ASP even is 
> > the fact that there is a barrier in their efficiency when
> > >> trying to stick to the interpreted schema. PHP has even 
> realized this.
> > >>
> > >> That's why you have about 10 trillion PHP modules to bypass (or 
> > "expand") on the limitations found in an interpreted 
> language. By moving 
> > more towards a traditional compile approach, we garner
> > >> assets in regards to language expansion and integration, 
> and scalability.
> > >>
> > >> The performance increase *is* noticeable in a production 
> environment. 
> > Scalability is the key. As a general rule, compiled and 
> tuned binaries 
> > will almost ALWAYS outrun and outperform interpreted
> > >> command-driven applications of the same ilk.
> > >>
> >
> >
> 
______________________________________________________________________
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to