And you are making assumptions as well here. A *GOOD* Flash developer would design the Flash interface to be lightweight, preload once (or as minimal as possible), and minimize the size of his/her Flash movies. No different is the argument that CFML is slow. Those of us that know CFML know that any poor developer can write bad CFML that will inherently be slow.
I fail to understand your point of view on this. I think you can see where I am coming from. Paul W. Wille [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------- Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer --------------------------------------------------- ISITE Design, Inc. -- Senior Programmer www.isitedesign.com 615 SW Broadway, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97205 503.221.9860 x110 503.221.9865 -----Original Message----- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 5:26 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda? > If your whole site is in Flash it loads once. The Flash movie is equal > to one or two rich HTML pages in size. Perform more than two functions > on your site and you're then passing less data than you would via HTML. > That's the simplified version of how it works. I doubt Talkers really > cares more about it than that, unless they're actually building an app. > Then it's worth it to go into the specifics. > You are making assumptions. Flash gives you the ability to do things you couldn't do before in html, which could required higher bandwidth than the equivalent application using html. While the extra bandwidth may be worth it for a better experience, the extra bandwidth is still there. Flash applications do not inherently save bandwidth. -Matt ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
