I use it as much as I can also, but it is by no means a replacement for many of the cf tags.
Robert Everland III Web Developer Extraordinaire Dixon Ticonderoga Company http://www.dixonusa.com -----Original Message----- From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:kkz@;foureyes.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:34 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP That's pretty much what I've done at my company as well. CFSCRIPT is just so much cleaner, and easier to read. CFML tends to be only used when we are annotating HTML. Fregas wrote: >I know a development firm that tends not to use <CF> at all, but >instead puts everything in <CFSCRIPT> that they can. They claim tags >are deprecated in CFML. ;) > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Rob Rohan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:42 PM >Subject: RE: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP > > > > >>CF syntax is not ugly, but i do get tired of typing < > >>Thank God for cfscript >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:jeff@;farcryfly.com] >>Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:28 PM >>To: CF-Talk >>Subject: Re: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP >> >> >> That is interesting... >> Check out Slide 22 . >> >> I wouldn't say that CF has an ugly syntax. ( I doubt many on this >>list would ). >> >> >>At 05:13 PM 10/29/2002 -0500, you wrote: >> >> >>>Check it out, in their presentation for why they chose PHP, they make >>>reference as to why they didn't go with CF or ASP >>> >>> >>> >>>http://public.yahoo.com/~radwin/talks/yahoo-phpcon2002.htm >>> >>> >>> >>>Ben >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
