They're just jealous... Either that or they've got their propeller stuck too far up their...
;oD ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 6:22 PM Subject: Re: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP > You know, I am so sick and tired of having to defend CF, at work to other developers here....... You know I don't see php, or asp people having do defend using those languages..... WTF!! > > F%$# it I am changing career's and becoming a firefighter....... > > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/30/02 01:07PM >>> > No it's not, in and of itself. > > However, thanks to CFMX, you can now build CFML-style UDFs, and thus > swap out a CFML call with a CFSCRIPT-like UDF call. > > Check out http://www.cflib.org/, if you haven't in the past. The > libraries are full of these. > > Robert Everland wrote: > > >I use it as much as I can also, but it is by no means a replacement for many > >of the cf tags. > > > >Robert Everland III > >Web Developer Extraordinaire > >Dixon Ticonderoga Company > >http://www.dixonusa.com > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:kkz@;foureyes.com] > >Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:34 PM > >To: CF-Talk > >Subject: Re: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP > > > > > >That's pretty much what I've done at my company as well. > > > >CFSCRIPT is just so much cleaner, and easier to read. > > > >CFML tends to be only used when we are annotating HTML. > > > >Fregas wrote: > > > > > > > >>I know a development firm that tends not to use <CF> at all, but > >>instead puts everything in <CFSCRIPT> that they can. They claim tags > >>are deprecated in CFML. ;) > >> > >> > >>----- Original Message ----- > >>From: "Rob Rohan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:42 PM > >>Subject: RE: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>>CF syntax is not ugly, but i do get tired of typing < > > >>>Thank God for cfscript > >>> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:jeff@;farcryfly.com] > >>>Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:28 PM > >>>To: CF-Talk > >>>Subject: Re: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP > >>> > >>> > >>> That is interesting... > >>> Check out Slide 22 . > >>> > >>> I wouldn't say that CF has an ugly syntax. ( I doubt many on this > >>>list would ). > >>> > >>> > >>>At 05:13 PM 10/29/2002 -0500, you wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Check it out, in their presentation for why they chose PHP, they make > >>>>reference as to why they didn't go with CF or ASP > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>http://public.yahoo.com/~radwin/talks/yahoo-phpcon2002.htm > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Ben > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
