thank you! >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/30/02 01:40PM >>> <plug>
http://www.learnatest.com/shop/ProfessionList.cfm?sbc=FIRE&mbc=FFGTR </plug> --> -----Original Message----- --> From: Michael Ross [mailto:ross-5@;medctr.osu.edu] --> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:22 AM --> To: CF-Talk --> Subject: Re: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP --> --> You know, I am so sick and tired of having to defend CF, at work to --> other developers here....... You know I don't see php, or asp people --> having do defend using those languages..... WTF!! --> --> F%$# it I am changing career's and becoming a firefighter....... --> --> --> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/30/02 01:07PM >>> --> No it's not, in and of itself. --> --> However, thanks to CFMX, you can now build CFML-style UDFs, and thus --> swap out a CFML call with a CFSCRIPT-like UDF call. --> --> Check out http://www.cflib.org/, if you haven't in the past. The --> libraries are full of these. --> --> Robert Everland wrote: --> --> >I use it as much as I can also, but it is by no means a replacement for --> many --> >of the cf tags. --> > --> >Robert Everland III --> >Web Developer Extraordinaire --> >Dixon Ticonderoga Company --> >http://www.dixonusa.com --> > --> >-----Original Message----- --> >From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:kkz@;foureyes.com] --> >Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:34 PM --> >To: CF-Talk --> >Subject: Re: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP --> > --> > --> >That's pretty much what I've done at my company as well. --> > --> >CFSCRIPT is just so much cleaner, and easier to read. --> > --> >CFML tends to be only used when we are annotating HTML. --> > --> >Fregas wrote: --> > --> > --> > --> >>I know a development firm that tends not to use <CF> at all, but --> >>instead puts everything in <CFSCRIPT> that they can. They claim tags --> >>are deprecated in CFML. ;) --> >> --> >> --> >>----- Original Message ----- --> >>From: "Rob Rohan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --> >>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --> >>Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:42 PM --> >>Subject: RE: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP --> >> --> >> --> >> --> >> --> >> --> >> --> >>>CF syntax is not ugly, but i do get tired of typing < > --> >>>Thank God for cfscript --> >>> --> >>>-----Original Message----- --> >>>From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:jeff@;farcryfly.com] --> >>>Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:28 PM --> >>>To: CF-Talk --> >>>Subject: Re: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP --> >>> --> >>> --> >>> That is interesting... --> >>> Check out Slide 22 . --> >>> --> >>> I wouldn't say that CF has an ugly syntax. ( I doubt many on this --> >>>list would ). --> >>> --> >>> --> >>>At 05:13 PM 10/29/2002 -0500, you wrote: --> >>> --> >>> --> >>> --> >>> --> >>>>Check it out, in their presentation for why they chose PHP, they --> make --> >>>>reference as to why they didn't go with CF or ASP --> >>>> --> >>>> --> >>>> --> >>>>http://public.yahoo.com/~radwin/talks/yahoo-phpcon2002.htm --> >>>> --> >>>> --> >>>> --> >>>>Ben --> >>>> --> >>>> --> >>>> --> >>>> --> >>>> --> >>>> --> >>>> --> >>>> --> >>> --> >>> --> >>> --> >>> --> > --> > --> --> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
