I guess I'm used to it. I've also been a Macintosh user since '94. :O
Michael Ross wrote: >You know, I am so sick and tired of having to defend CF, at work to other developers >here....... You know I don't see php, or asp people having do defend using those >languages..... WTF!! > >F%$# it I am changing career's and becoming a firefighter....... > > > > >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/30/02 01:07PM >>> >>>> >>>> >No it's not, in and of itself. > >However, thanks to CFMX, you can now build CFML-style UDFs, and thus >swap out a CFML call with a CFSCRIPT-like UDF call. > >Check out http://www.cflib.org/, if you haven't in the past. The >libraries are full of these. > >Robert Everland wrote: > > > >>I use it as much as I can also, but it is by no means a replacement for many >>of the cf tags. >> >>Robert Everland III >>Web Developer Extraordinaire >>Dixon Ticonderoga Company >>http://www.dixonusa.com >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:kkz@;foureyes.com] >>Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:34 PM >>To: CF-Talk >>Subject: Re: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP >> >> >>That's pretty much what I've done at my company as well. >> >>CFSCRIPT is just so much cleaner, and easier to read. >> >>CFML tends to be only used when we are annotating HTML. >> >>Fregas wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>I know a development firm that tends not to use <CF> at all, but >>>instead puts everything in <CFSCRIPT> that they can. They claim tags >>>are deprecated in CFML. ;) >>> >>> >>>----- Original Message ----- >>>From: "Rob Rohan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:42 PM >>>Subject: RE: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>CF syntax is not ugly, but i do get tired of typing < > >>>>Thank God for cfscript >>>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:jeff@;farcryfly.com] >>>>Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:28 PM >>>>To: CF-Talk >>>>Subject: Re: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP >>>> >>>> >>>>That is interesting... >>>>Check out Slide 22 . >>>> >>>> I wouldn't say that CF has an ugly syntax. ( I doubt many on this >>>>list would ). >>>> >>>> >>>>At 05:13 PM 10/29/2002 -0500, you wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Check it out, in their presentation for why they chose PHP, they make >>>>>reference as to why they didn't go with CF or ASP >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>http://public.yahoo.com/~radwin/talks/yahoo-phpcon2002.htm >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Ben >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
