You know, I am so sick and tired of having to defend CF, at work to other developers 
here.......  You know I don't see php, or asp people having do defend using those 
languages.....  WTF!!

F%$# it I am changing career's and becoming a firefighter.......


>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/30/02 01:07PM >>>
No it's not, in and of itself.

However, thanks to CFMX, you can now build CFML-style UDFs, and thus 
swap out a CFML call with a CFSCRIPT-like UDF call.

Check out http://www.cflib.org/, if you haven't in the past.  The 
libraries are full of these.

Robert Everland wrote:

>I use it as much as I can also, but it is by no means a replacement for many
>of the cf tags.
>
>Robert Everland III
>Web Developer Extraordinaire
>Dixon Ticonderoga Company
>http://www.dixonusa.com 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:kkz@;foureyes.com] 
>Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:34 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP
>
>
>That's pretty much what I've done at my company as well.
>
>CFSCRIPT is just so much cleaner, and easier to read.
>
>CFML tends to be only used when we are annotating HTML.
>
>Fregas wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I know a development firm that tends not to use <CF> at all, but 
>>instead puts everything in <CFSCRIPT> that they can.  They claim tags 
>>are deprecated in CFML.  ;)
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Rob Rohan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:42 PM
>>Subject: RE: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>CF syntax is not ugly, but i do get tired of typing < >
>>>Thank God for cfscript
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:jeff@;farcryfly.com]
>>>Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:28 PM
>>>To: CF-Talk
>>>Subject: Re: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP
>>>
>>>
>>> That is interesting...
>>> Check out Slide 22 .
>>>
>>>  I wouldn't say that CF has an ugly syntax.  ( I doubt many on this 
>>>list would ).
>>>
>>>
>>>At 05:13 PM 10/29/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Check it out, in their presentation for why they chose PHP, they make 
>>>>reference as to why they didn't go with CF or ASP
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>http://public.yahoo.com/~radwin/talks/yahoo-phpcon2002.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Ben
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Reply via email to