Certainly, but most IT organizations are more concerned with maturity and stability than upgrade cost.
Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ 888-408-0900 x901 > -----Original Message----- > From: Plunkett, Matt [mailto:MPlunkett@;MSA.com] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 9:57 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: MM Has No Plans to Support Apache 2.0 > > Of course, the logical distinction is that an Apache upgrade is free... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:mliotta@;r337.com] > > While I agree with you that Macromedia should support Apache 2.0 for CF > 5, I disagree with your post. You seem to imply that a normal IT shop > wouldn't want to upgrade to CFMX until after it matures for a couple of > years, yet you want to upgrade to Apache 2.0, which is certainly > immature in comparison to Apache 1.3. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
