Free or not, it's still a business decision that should have been made. Don't upgrade to something you know that's not going to support your server side. I have to agree with Matt, I stated this myself last week as well.
CFMX is technically free if one had a subscription. ~Todd On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Plunkett, Matt wrote: > Of course, the logical distinction is that an Apache upgrade is free... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:mliotta@;r337.com] > > While I agree with you that Macromedia should support Apache 2.0 for CF > 5, I disagree with your post. You seem to imply that a normal IT shop > wouldn't want to upgrade to CFMX until after it matures for a couple of > years, yet you want to upgrade to Apache 2.0, which is certainly > immature in comparison to Apache 1.3. -- ============================================================ Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ | Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion | http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/ | http://www.devmx.com/ - Todd (Moderator / CoFounder) | http://www.flashCFM.com/ - webRat (Moderator) | Speakeasy DSL - http://www.speakeasy.net/refer/18280 | ============================================================ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
