BTW, here is a thread on this subject if anyone cares for more insight.

http://webforums.macromedia.com/coldfusion/messageview.cfm?catid=10&thre
adid=415411&STARTPAGE=1

Matt Liotta
President & CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
888-408-0900 x901

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Liotta [mailto:mliotta@;r337.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:16 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: CFMX and Apache 1.3.x on *nix (was RE: MM Has No Plans to
Support
> Apache 2.0)
> 
> You may not be wrong in your lack of support of new versions of CF. It
> has become clear me and many others that CFMX and Apache 1.3.x on *nix
> is not ready for primetime. Unless your organization can make use of
> Apache 2.0.x, you shouldn't upgrade to CFMX at this time.
> 
> Matt Liotta
> President & CEO
> Montara Software, Inc.
> http://www.montarasoftware.com/
> 888-408-0900 x901
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Justin Greene [mailto:247601589883116300006@;spamex.com]
> > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:18 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: MM Has No Plans to Support Apache 2.0
> >
> > This is a particularly sore spot for me as I started the same thread
a
> > while
> > back when MM refused to create a -EAPI build of the 1.3.x apache dll
> for
> > CF
> > 4.5.  They tried to claim that DEAPI was post 4.5 and therefore I
was
> > asking
> > for legacy support, then when I showed them that DEAPI actually
> existed
> > prior to the release of 4.5 they ultimately said they would do it,
> then
> > never came through.
> >
> > Because of that I will no longer support the new versions of Cold
> Fusion
> > as
> > a developer.  I am still running 4.5 for most of my products, which
is
> > stable and fast enough, and will be porting to something else,
either
> Java
> > or PHP when a new developmetn is required.
> >
> > MM lost a long time Cold Fusion develment house over this (we have
> been
> > developing in CF since version 1.5), which is stupid as it is a
simple
> > recompile.  Clearly this is about forcing upgrades down our throats
> and
> > not
> > about providing good support for the customer base, which ultimatly
> makes
> > us
> > buy the upgrades willingly.
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:mliotta@;r337.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 9:44 AM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: RE: MM Has No Plans to Support Apache 2.0
> > >
> > > While I agree with you that Macromedia should support Apache
> > > 2.0 for CF
> > > 5, I disagree with your post. You seem to imply that a normal IT
> shop
> > > wouldn't want to upgrade to CFMX until after it matures for a
> > > couple of
> > > years, yet you want to upgrade to Apache 2.0, which is certainly
> > > immature in comparison to Apache 1.3.
> > >
> > >
> > > Matt Liotta
> > > President & CEO
> > > Montara Software, Inc.
> > > http://www.montarasoftware.com/
> > > 888-408-0900 x901
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Greg Bullough [mailto:gwb@;outofchaos.com]
> > > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 9:39 AM
> > > > To: CF-Talk
> > > > Subject: MM Has No Plans to Support Apache 2.0
> > > >
> > > > The MM Partners office informs me that
> > > > MM has no plans to supply a mod_coldfusion.so
> > > > for CF 5.0/Linux/Apache 2.0
> > > >
> > > > 'Not enough demand' they say.
> > > >
> > > > So know we know MM's policy on one-release-
> > > > back support. They don't do what's right: they
> > > > do what will not get them punished by losing
> > > > too many customers.
> > > >
> > > > If you haven't picked the platform that's going to be most
> > > > popular, you're out of luck, and even if you have, maybe
> > > > you're out of luck anyway, and if you're not prepared to
> > > > keep churning through releases (rather than maintaining
> > > > existing release levels for several years, as is normal I/T
> > > > practice) you're out of luck.
> > > >
> > > > As such, MM has decided that Cold Fusion is the
> > > > wrong choice for mission-critical business applications,
> > > > because it will not have the kind of support that the
> > > > I/T industry expects.
> > > >
> > > > Greg
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Reply via email to