Hi, Actually, I totally understand where you're coming from. I wasn't trying to imply that Fusebox is better, because for some people it certainly is not. And, you are right--A methodology is supposed to make development smoother; or at least more standardized. If it doesn't then you shouldn't use it. Given that Fusebox has been through so many changes and because there are now several hybrids available that address many of the issues developers have faced in the past, I was simply suggesting that you re-test the waters to determine if the workaround issues you are concerned with still exist.
In any case, you seem to be very comfortable and productive within your own methodology; that is all that truly counts. :) Best regards MW -----Original Message----- From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 3:21 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: FBX3 AND CFMX Nope..ya missed my point....CFMX migration was just an example. but now we're heading towards what's better ;-) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
