> Yes, most developers just want to get something working and go home... > and then there are others who... are passionate about what they do... > Which one do you belog to :)
And yet others are passionate, but read the documentation for a product and find out that a particular method to solving a problem is not the recommended way, and to use the new, more efficient way. In reading the documentation, this new, more efficient way will give me better performance and further provide a better product to my client. I, and I would wager a good number of developers, belong to this group, even though there's no official membership package. > I think you are missing the point here.. Joe, I thought you said a few posts back that this subject is closed for you. And yet you continue to respond to it. Can we please just let this go? I'm not disputing that there may be a bug with the ODBC bridge in MX -- I've always used the native drivers. But you obviously have your opinion as to how to resolve the issue, and other developers have theirs. If you continue to have problems with Macromedia's approach, please either get in touch with them directly or move on to another company's technology. Sorry, but after 50 posts, this is really old. Thanks in advance, Dave. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
