> I am NOT saying "ANY".. software is not perfect!. We are > not talking about one specific issue... CFMX has had numerous > issues... (Check Updater Docs... if you want to start counting > them)
Every complex software product I've ever seen has numerous bugs. I'm not sure why you'd expect CFMX to be any different. > > My solution is to find the best way to solve a problem. > > If JDBC-ODBC doesn't work well in CFMX, but "pure" JDBC > > does, my solution may well be to recommend "pure" JDBC. > > Yes.. JDBC is a Solution/Alternative.. Not a fix to the > software(cfmx) BUG. > > Example...CFMX had COM Issues...am not sure where it > stands now... Any COM functionality can be replicated > very well through a Java Bean.. So in your theory... > Instead of MM fixing COM issues... you probably will > ask all your developers to re-write every COM in a > Java Bean? > > You have really have interesting theories. No, I don't have any theories, just observations. If there are two ways to do something, and one works better than the other, I'll recommend the one that works. If I need COM interoperability, I might not recommend a CFMX solution. For that matter, I might not recommend CF 5 for that, either. But I'm not going to wait for perfection from any vendor. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
