> Well, the guy i was working for only had cf5 on his server ... and he got
paid and he
> paid me, and the client(s) were happy. So it was worth it for us. There
are lots of
> multilingual sites and "foreign" (to the US) language sites running on
CF5.

good for you and in the long run too bad for the client. it's non-standard,
it won't port, it dead-ends the data, yadda yadda yadda. i can't agree
w/doing things like that now.

> Chinese is the only language that we've done where we really couldn't have
on CF5 ...
> not to say multilingual isn't generally easier on CFMX, but it's not
always necessary.

well i can say that i have done chinese language apps w/cf5 (when there was
only cf5) and i know of someone else in hong kong who was forced to do the
same thing (at about the same time). neither of us would do that now. its
just not worth it.

in any case, please re-read the subject. it says "Multilingual". that's not
something that should be attempted with cf5.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to