Well, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but a good, solid, well-designed object oriented methodology will always beat spaghetti code. FuseBox is a methodology, but it is not OO. Let's be clear on that point.
-----Original Message----- From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 1:50 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: MX Methodologies (Mach2?? Fusebox??) >>that you can still develop CF Apps in a timely menner without the use of FB or MACH II that do utilize proper OO techniques... and that perform better, as well. Exact, and I would even add "that utilises NO OO technique, and it will even be faster to develop, and perform even better. I recently had to add some features in a FB application, it was including more than 100 files and it took me hours to find the one I had to modify to do the job. This is how a good willing concept is finally having the oposite result it is intended to. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:185560 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
