I'd call Fusebox a framework more than a methodology (FLiP is the methodology commonly used to support Fusebox projects). And while the framework code itself is not OO (where Mach-II is), you can easily build CFC-based object models that fully follow OO principles and leverage them in a Fusebox application.
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:57:45 -0800, Steve Brownlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but a good, solid, well-designed > object oriented methodology will always beat spaghetti code. FuseBox is a > methodology, but it is not OO. Let's be clear on that point. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:185567 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
