On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:57:45 -0800, Steve Brownlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but a good, solid, well-designed > object oriented methodology will always beat spaghetti code. FuseBox is a > methodology, but it is not OO. Let's be clear on that point.
As Brian already pointed out, Fusebox (small 'b', by the way) is not a methodology, it is a framework. There is a methodology associated with it, called FLiP. Mind you, quite a bit of FLiP is actually framework-neutral... As a huge fan of OO - I've been doing it for nearly thirteen years now - I would also reiterate Brian's point that you can definitely use Fusebox with a full-blown OO Model as part of an MVC-based application. I'll be talking at several conferences and user groups in 2005 on the subject of frameworks - comparing Fusebox 4.x and Mach II. -- Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/ Breeze Me! -- http://www.corfield.org/breezeme Got Gmail? -- I have 1 invite "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:185585 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
