Well actually I can kind of see the logic behind it now.  We have been
mainly still on CF5 up until recent months and therefore a lot of the people
there do not know a bit about features specific to MX.  So if they were to
be asked MX specific questions one might very well get "deer in the
headlight responses"  They are however very good developers in that they can
interact well with clients in finding what their needs are and build them
solutions that the clients are happy with.

On 8/24/06, Jeff Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I didn't mean to offend anyone's sensibilities by suggesting that
> working on intranets and reporting tools was an indication of lesser CF
> skills.  The observation was based solely on the interviews we conducted.
> Many of them were still on version 5, in fact. (We had one sad case who
> actually said she was working in "MX 5".)
>
> It really all depends on the person and what types of stuff they've
> created. I agree, intranets can be very extensive and elaborate.
>
> -Jeff
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:250977
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to