No problem, it's late.. There wouldn't be a difference in those two if you provide both with TS access.
I think we're in agreement more than not here. It may be a finer point on the TS access, where I think giving people TS access when they don't really need it. They may also not fully understand the responsibilities they are accepting when they do. I didn't like the original statement because it seem too far reaching. Though I do think you should think of any network to be hostile, regardless of the situation. More access points with the full range of services that TS provides than less would naturally, in my mind, mean a more hostile network than not. For example, hosting your VPS at TJ Maxx would be in a less secure environment than at NSA. But you should always assume that you're in the weaker of the two. John [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 9:54 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Shared Hosting vs VPS -----Original Message----- From: "Dave Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[email protected]> Sent: 23 Sep 07 21:32 Subject: RE: Shared Hosting vs VPS > > Actually no, there way too many assumptions being made to make that > > statement. I thought I made that fairly clear. > > No, you haven't. Your assertion alone is insufficient. Rereading my response, I realize it may have been a bit terse. But again, how is this any different from dedicated hosting? Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Check out the new features and enhancements in the latest product release - download the "What's New PDF" now http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/coldfusion/cf8_beta_whatsnew_052907.pdf Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:289267 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
