While you are in there, you might want to spell check the rest of the home
page :-)
 
Im not trying to nitpick, I only noticed them (except for Coldfusion... that
usually stands out to me) because I sent the link to my colleagues along
with the text from the home page as a description for the link.

Outlook barked at me when I hit send.

Cheers
 
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:bo...@acoderslife.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 6:10 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: cfdot.net (was: CF vs. ASP.Net)


Note that you spelled ColdFusion as Coldfusion on the home page. 

"development knowledge from Coldfusion to C#.net and " 
 
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Jordan Michaels [mailto:jor...@viviotech.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 5:48 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: cfdot.net (was: CF vs. ASP.Net)


This is pretty sweet Jose.

Thanks for taking the time to create this site! An excellent resource 
indeed.

Warm regards,
Jordan Michaels
Vivio Technologies
http://www.viviotech.net/
Open BlueDragon Steering Committee
Railo Community Distributions

On 06/22/2010 06:47 AM, Jose Diaz wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Unfortunatly the company I work for decided to move away from CF :( and
> proceeded to get shot of all the cf devs we had.
> I was one of two survivors who they see as legacy application developers
grr
> even thou I decided to become an MCPD, they still see us a just CF devs.
>
> Anyhoo I did build the following site: www.cfdot.net which shows code
> comparisons for most of the common langauge syntax tasks.
>
> If anything it will show how CF achieves in one line what .net does in 10
;)
> (my little dig back heh)
>
> Jose
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Sean
Corfield<seancorfi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Dave Watts<dwa...@figleaf.com>  wrote:
>>>> Well, there ya go, we got another 4 years to learn new languages...
>> Adobe,
>>>> way to set a bleak future for your own product!
>>> Adobe didn't write that, Gartner did. And overall, it's a pretty
>>> positive whitepaper.
>>
>> Particularly since Gartner has, in the past, been rather negative
>> about ColdFusion...
>>
>> Nice to see that Gartner view the presence of "established open-source
>> alternatives to Adobe's ColdFusion" as helping protect investment in
>> CF technology.
>> --
>> Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
>> Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://getrailo.com/
>> An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
>>
>> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
>> -- Margaret Atwood
>>
>>
>
> 





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:334757
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to