My apologies. I came into the thread late, and had only seen bits about "getting started". I didn't realize that the OP was asking specific questions about SVN.
I still agree with Adam, though, that one getting started with source control should look at Git as well. On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Wil Genovese <jugg...@trunkful.com> wrote: > > "Out of context" for this thread? This thread was a question about how to > do "xyz" with Subversion. Anything about using Git, the kewl kids are using > Git, Git is Defacto, etc etc etc, is out of context. > > Every technology is a tool and each tool has it's uses. Just because some > have manage to replace one tool for another does not mean it's right for > some else's team. This technology zealotry is annoying at best and for the > most part useless off-topic squabbling. Most of the replies here have not > even addressed the OP and his questions, aside from my initial reply to the > OP. > > SVN is very valid and is used heavily will continue to be used long from > now. And the same should be said about Git. > > For those that remember the old slow Tortoise client maybe you should > revisit SVN with a new client. As of the 1.7 releases of the SVN clients > they no longer use the .svn files and folders. Additionally the 1.7 SVN > clients work perfectly with the SVN 1.6 server. This change in client > behavior has made working with very large repos mush easier and faster. If > fact he new SVN clients are similar to the Git clients in that fashion. > > I hope the OP did find use in the first few responses before this SVN vs > Git feud started. It would be a shame to drive a person away because > instead of getting his question answered everyone decided to start a > technology flame war. > > Now have a nice day. > > > > > Wil Genovese > Sr. Web Application Developer/ > Systems Administrator > CF Webtools > www.cfwebtools.com > > wilg...@trunkful.com > www.trunkful.com > > On Jan 30, 2013, at 10:01 AM, Matt Quackenbush <quackfu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Andrew Scott wrote: > > > >> > >> Till then my view is not going > >> to change, > > > > > > > > LOL. That's what we all love about you, my friend! :-) > > > > > > > >> in a team SVN is far better when you know how to use it right. > >> > > > > > > And there are countless teams who have used both - "correctly" - who > > vehemently disagree with you. But again, this is out of context for this > > thread, and therefore a non-starter. > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:354147 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
