Very true.  Almost every client over the years has not blinked at a retainer
fee to start the work.  We go the route of designers:  33 down, 33
acceptance of mock, 33 upon delivery to server...or it doesn't go live.  The
only ones we have had complain were the ones who would try to take us for a
ride.

Regards,

Eric J. Hoffman
Director of Internet Development
DataStream Connexion, LLC
(formerly Small Dog Design)

-----Original Message-----
From: laszlo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 1:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Advice and opinion on client who has a problem paying
bills


Very well said, Mark.

In addition:
- Many times these kind of things are what I call the
"mismatch of expectations" and is not necessarily
implies that any of the parties is a 'bad guy'.
Therefore, a 'contract' is always a must.
I like writing the scope of work together with
the client: He knows what he wants, I know what
can be done.
We (developers) hate to do this kind of work,
but if you are an independent consultant, it's a
must.
I usually charge hourly rate for writing up specs,
even if I go for a fixed bid. The reason is, that
I cannot give a fix price, before the spec is cast
in stone, but I know, that a detailed spec is
going to take time, otherwise it's useless.

- I also strongly advocate to maintain a 'retainer' fee.
And while some clients are not crazy about it, you
can explain them why it is necessary. If a client
plainly rejects the retainer idea, it's my experience,
that they may not plan to keep the balance up-to-date.
So I usually don't deal with them.

Sorry, if some of this was OT, but felt like I can share
some of the things I learned during the 25+ years
of consulting.

Regards,
laszlo


______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to