You're on the wrong list. We were talking about being a hedonist on CFGURU. And I'm the one drinking... Anyway, think about the perspective of non-CFers for a bit. Will Java people respect CFMX for what it is when they see some of the crap with CFCs? I am willing to bet that Java developers would have more respect for CFMX if CFCs weren't there.
-Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 4:03 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: I like CFMX > > > Relax? I started drinking at about noon. I think if I get > > any more relaxed, I am going to fall asleep. > > Uh, ok. Maybe you're a hedonist after all, except you'll be too tired to > have any fun. There are better drugs for true hedonists than alcohol, I > understand. > > > There are a lot of ways to argue this point. My point of > > view is that MM shouldn't tease us with OO type constructs. > > Either gives everything J2EE has to offer or don't bother > > at all. > > Maybe so. However, for a lot of CF developers, this will be the first baby > step towards OO development, and it won't be a tease for them. Keep in > mind > that you're probably not in the common demographic of CF developers. > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > http://www.figleaf.com/ > voice: (202) 797-5496 > fax: (202) 797-5444 > > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
