As soon as I saw Mike's post I went and started writing some test cases in Java and CFMX. Looks like I was wrong on this point. It gets worse too. Sean posted code on the BACFUG list on how to override methods in extended CFCs. So it looks like I was wrong on that point too. Maybe I have had too much to drink as I don't ever remember being flat out wrong like this before.
-Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Pete Freitag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:25 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: I like CFMX > > Yes, that's very odd, Matt were you thinking of protected access > specifies... > > Here's some Java code that if you cannot compile (at least not in 1.3) > > Here's the compiler error > > Tester.java [25:1] private void method() has private access in Tester > super.method(); > ^ > 1 error > Errors compiling Tester. > > and the code... > > public class Tester { > > public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception{ > SubTester st = new SubTester(); > st.doMethod(); > } > > private void method() { > System.out.println("Tester::method"); > } > > } > > > class SubTester > extends Tester > { > public void doMethod() { > this.method(); > } > private void method() { > super.method(); > System.out.println("SubTester::method"); > } > } > > Matt I think you may need to cut back on the alcohol :) > > _____________________________________________ > Pete Freitag ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > CTO, CFDEV.COM > ColdFusion Developer Resources > http://www.cfdev.com/ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:43 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: I like CFMX > > > hmm, thats odd. > > >From Java In A NutShell 3rd ed.(published by Oreilly) > > Page 106 : Access to members > > "If a member of a class is declared private, the member is never > accessible except within the class itself." > > Page 107 : Access control and inheritance > > "Private fields and methods are never inherited..." > > we are talkig about the same thing aren't we? > > mike chambers > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:14 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: I like CFMX > > > > > > In Java, a subclass does in fact inherit private methods and > > properties. > > > > -Matt > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Mike Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 3:59 PM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: RE: I like CFMX > > > > > > matt, > > > > > > correct if i am wrong (my java is a little rusty), but when > > inheriting > > > from a class in java, the subclass does not inherit private > > methods or > > > properties from the superclass (only protected and public). > > > > > > mike chambers > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > There are a lot of ways to argue this point. My point of view > > > > is that MM > > > > shouldn't tease us with OO type constructs. Either gives > > > > everything J2EE > > > > has to offer or don't bother at all. > > > > > > > > -Matt > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
