> You're on the wrong list. We were talking about being a > hedonist on CFGURU. And I'm the one drinking...
Same conversation, different street corner. And drinking at noon doesn't make you a hedonist, necessarily; it could make you a sot. Maybe you're drinking your troubles away? > Anyway, think about the perspective of non-CFers for a bit. > Will Java people respect CFMX for what it is when they see > some of the crap with CFCs? I am willing to bet that Java > developers would have more respect for CFMX if CFCs weren't > there. I think it's futile to construct the CF platform so that it'll please Java developers. CFML is thought of as a "toy" language now by that camp. Why would someone who wants to write in an OO environment consider CF at all? For that matter, CF has been thought of as a toy since its inception; everybody who used something else was always happy to disparage CF in favor of (Java/ASP/PHP/Perl/fill-in-the-blank). And, CF has almost always been a better solution than those alternatives. I'm happy to continue playing with CF, as long as it can be used to deliver solutions better, faster, and cheaper than the competition. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
