> Dig a tiny bit deeper and you'll find the core files. > Currently the core files, are the spec. We're just a > bunch of stupid programmers and our attempt at actually > writing a spec for Fusebox comes about from writing > an implementation of a bunch of ideas, then calling > that the specification. :-) It came out backwards but > somehow it worked. There are multiple implementations > of Fusebox that all work the same. We're working on a > true specification through our new Fusebox steering > committee which will allow core files to be created in > just about any way to produce the standard Fusebox outcome.
Well, from one stupid programmer to another, I'll retain my complaint that there isn't a spec. I mean, that's a bit loose, isn't it? How do I know that one implementation is definitive? How do I know that the behavior of one implementation should be the exact behavior of all implementations? Honestly, out of all the Fusebox applications I've seen, no two have been that alike! Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
