I think the bottom line is that a person must decide for themselves whether or not a certain methodology or technique is for them. I currently use FB2 and have not migrated over to FB3, and not for the fact that I do not like it, but I am happy with the FB2 framework and do not see the need for myself. Currently I build applications both in FB and without, it all depends on the size of the application and how many components it will have. I can build a smaller application much faster by not using FB then I can with it.I prefer to only use FB on larger applications where I may need team involvement and can hand off different fuses to be done by differnet people without interupting the flow of things.
Douglas Brown Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Drew Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:12 PM Subject: Re: Fusebox (was: I like CFMX) > Perhaps I have joined this conversation too late to participate. > However, I'm wandering: What is the purpose of this thread? > At first I thought it was a discussion about Fusebox. > Or is it a discussion about "web architectures"? > > -Oh well, seems to be dieing out anyway. > Drew > > > On 4/29/02 11:55 PM, "Dave Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> For the beginner my friend, in layman's terms. Seriously. > >> I am paying attention, and I am never so close minded that > >> I cannot be swayed, but truth be told I heard a bunch of > >> buzzwords, and some stuff that I should probably know more > >> about. > > > > One of the problems with learning programming, in my opinion, is that there > > are a lot of separate, distinct topics that you have to understand before > > you can make sense of the whole. To me, this is an example of that. I think > > that Matt would be hard-pressed to summarize these points well enough that > > someone without the right background would understand them. Of course, I'll > > leave that up to him to decide! > > > > I realize that this may strike you as a cop-out, but I think that it's an > > accurate assessment. These ARE things you should know more about, but > > they're things that don't crop up as obvious issues in most CF development, > > because of the nature of CFML. It's a very loose, easy language. What I've > > learned of that list of buzzwords, I didn't learn until I forced myself to > > learn it, by dint of learning OO programming and multi-tiered environments - > > and there's quite a bit of it that I still don't know. Furthermore, until > > you've exposed yourself to these other environments and languages, you may > > not see the relevance for CF development, but it's there. > > > > In the meantime, feel free to use Fusebox if it helps you do your job > > better. Do whatever you like, if it helps you do your job better. Just > > remember that it's a big world out there, and the broader your perspective, > > the easier it'll be for you to see the connections between things and why > > those connections matter. > > > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > > http://www.figleaf.com/ > > voice: (202) 797-5496 > > fax: (202) 797-5444 > > > > > __________________________________________________________________ ____ > This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. > FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
