Ok Matt,
        For the beginner my friend, in layman's terms.  Seriously.  I am paying
attention, and I am never so close minded that I cannot be swayed, but truth
be told I heard a bunch of buzzwords, and some stuff that I should probably
know more about.

Tim Heald
ACP/CCFD
Application Development
www.schoollink.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 12:27 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fusebox (was: I like CFMX)


Ok, off the top of my head...

An architecture would provide:
        * context for partitioning application at a macro level into
tiers
        * transparent redundancy of tiers
        * interfaces specific to each tier for application frameworks to
implement
        * additional stuff depending on application

An application framework would provide:
        * abstract implementation of architecture interfaces
        * library of concrete architecture interface implementations
        * context for partitioning tier into components
        * component infrastructure
        * additional stuff depending on application

-Matt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:13 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Fusebox (was: I like CFMX)
>
> Sure, list it all.
>
> Steve
>
> Matt Liotta wrote:
>
> > What do you want? Want me to list everything I expect in an
architecture
> > and application framework to show that Fusebox provides known of
them?
> > You don't really need me for that. Go to Google and do a search on
> > software architecture and application frameworks. You will find an
> > amazing amount of infrastructure that Fusebox is no where near
> > providing. You may even discover the true definitions for some of
the
> > terms Fusebox has bastardized.
> >
> > -Matt
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:56 PM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: RE: Fusebox (was: I like CFMX)
> > >
> > > >> So do tell, in detail if you please, what you find
> > > >> objectionable about it.
> > >
> > > > I don't use Fusebox because it does nothing for me.
> > >
> > >
> > > Uh huh. Most enlightening detail there Matt.
> > >
> > >
> >
>

______________________________________________________________________
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to