Matt, you don't have to be rude when you don't know the answer. Just say so, that's no big deal.
Since you're hung up on buzzwords Tim isn't clear on, explain your interpretation of those buzzwords for CF development, that's all he wants, not the text book version. I haven't been on this list for a long time, but it is still a CF list, right? Steve Matt Liotta wrote: > I'm sorry, but you are going to have to RTFM. I am not here to teach you > how to program or basic CS concepts. If you don't understand those > terms, that is fine, it won't stop you from being a CF developer. > However, it will stop you from contributing to this debate. > > -Matt > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tim Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:33 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: Fusebox (was: I like CFMX) > > > > Ok Matt, > > For the beginner my friend, in layman's terms. Seriously. I am > > paying > > attention, and I am never so close minded that I cannot be swayed, but > > truth > > be told I heard a bunch of buzzwords, and some stuff that I should > > probably > > know more about. > > > > Tim Heald > > ACP/CCFD > > Application Development > > www.schoollink.net > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 12:27 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: Fusebox (was: I like CFMX) > > > > > > Ok, off the top of my head... > > > > An architecture would provide: > > * context for partitioning application at a macro level into > > tiers > > * transparent redundancy of tiers > > * interfaces specific to each tier for application frameworks to > > implement > > * additional stuff depending on application > > > > An application framework would provide: > > * abstract implementation of architecture interfaces > > * library of concrete architecture interface implementations > > * context for partitioning tier into components > > * component infrastructure > > * additional stuff depending on application > > > > -Matt > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Steve Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:13 PM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: Re: Fusebox (was: I like CFMX) > > > > > > Sure, list it all. > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > Matt Liotta wrote: > > > > > > > What do you want? Want me to list everything I expect in an > > architecture > > > > and application framework to show that Fusebox provides known of > > them? > > > > You don't really need me for that. Go to Google and do a search on > > > > software architecture and application frameworks. You will find an > > > > amazing amount of infrastructure that Fusebox is no where near > > > > providing. You may even discover the true definitions for some of > > the > > > > terms Fusebox has bastardized. > > > > > > > > -Matt > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:56 PM > > > > > To: CF-Talk > > > > > Subject: RE: Fusebox (was: I like CFMX) > > > > > > > > > > >> So do tell, in detail if you please, what you find > > > > > >> objectionable about it. > > > > > > > > > > > I don't use Fusebox because it does nothing for me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Uh huh. Most enlightening detail there Matt. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
