On 1/30/06, Jason Daiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Speaking from experience going from FB3 to FB4 is a much easier > transition than from FB3 to MG.
I think that depends on your background. I found the jump from FB3 to FB4 much bigger than many others apparently found it. > One pro I found w/ FB4.1 vs MG at this > time is the ability to place all circuits, including controller, model > (CFC's) & view, in a shared area. Since the CFCs for MG can be placed anywhere, as can the views, this is already true for MG as far as I can tell. The only thing that needs to be in the webroot, for example, is the index.cfm entry point - all other files can be in a shared area outside of webroot (this is true for FB41, M2 and MG). -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Got frameworks? "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to cfcdev@cfczone.org with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/cfcdev@cfczone.org
