Adam,
I am sure you going to hear some slack for that but I am huge fan of what
you just said. In Hal Helm's presentation he noted that we really need to
quite being so data centric when thinking of OO development. MVC is a great
start for people to solve a specific problem but everyone really needs to
stop following everyone and thinking that 5 cfcs are OO development. I am
doing a lot of research at the moment about OO in other languages and hope
to share my findings soon.

Thank You
Dan Vega
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.danvega.org

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Adam Haskell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> At the end of the day we all need to stop talking about DOA and Gateways
> and all this Database crap as much as we do. Its old, trite, and quite
> honestly doesn't make a hill of beans difference most of the time. Honestly,
> ask yourself, "How many applications would I have been completely screwed if
> I chose to split my gateway and DAO up, or vice versa?" If you have a use
> case for that please by all means share it I'd love to hear it. If all we
> are concerned about is DAO or gateway then chances are something else, much
> more important, is being overlooked (not pointing fingers at anyone here :)
> ). If all you are doing is a large reporting app chances are you don't need
> to be doing complete OO anyway, yes I know sacrilege. Its true though
> ColdFusion is perfect for reporting without the heavy OO we try to apply to
> it in too many cases. Thinking back through some of the reporting apps I did
> and shoehorning them into an OO architecture I can confidently say I should
> have stuck with a light version of MVC and moved on.
>
> Adam Haskell
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CFCDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to