I have a good friend who is a Python developer as well so I hope to pick his
brain. I am just saying that I think Adam has the right mind set, we really
need to stop talking about DAO,Gateways & Service layers as the end all be
all.

Thank You
Dan Vega
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.danvega.org

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Peter Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Well, if you want to see OO in different languages, I'd look at:Java -
> high ceremony, good for large apps
> Ruby - low ceremony - very dynamic. Just remember not to blow your leg off
> Smalltalk - The granddaddy of OO languages but still used in some domains.
> Check out seaside for a continuation based web server. Very interesting and
> I'm hearing it scales better than I'd have expected. I think it'd dabbleDB
> that was written in Seaside.
>
> Best Wishes,
> Peter
>
> On Jun 24, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Dan Vega wrote:
>
> Adam,
> I am sure you going to hear some slack for that but I am huge fan of what
> you just said. In Hal Helm's presentation he noted that we really need to
> quite being so data centric when thinking of OO development. MVC is a great
> start for people to solve a specific problem but everyone really needs to
> stop following everyone and thinking that 5 cfcs are OO development. I am
> doing a lot of research at the moment about OO in other languages and hope
> to share my findings soon.
>
> Thank You
> Dan Vega
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.danvega.org
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Adam Haskell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> At the end of the day we all need to stop talking about DOA and Gateways
>> and all this Database crap as much as we do. Its old, trite, and quite
>> honestly doesn't make a hill of beans difference most of the time. Honestly,
>> ask yourself, "How many applications would I have been completely screwed if
>> I chose to split my gateway and DAO up, or vice versa?" If you have a use
>> case for that please by all means share it I'd love to hear it. If all we
>> are concerned about is DAO or gateway then chances are something else, much
>> more important, is being overlooked (not pointing fingers at anyone here :)
>> ). If all you are doing is a large reporting app chances are you don't need
>> to be doing complete OO anyway, yes I know sacrilege. Its true though
>> ColdFusion is perfect for reporting without the heavy OO we try to apply to
>> it in too many cases. Thinking back through some of the reporting apps I did
>> and shoehorning them into an OO architecture I can confidently say I should
>> have stuck with a light version of MVC and moved on.
>>
>> Adam Haskell
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CFCDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to