> 
> I haven't used the Chapel IRC, so my only thought would be is the
> conversation worth logging?
> 

Want to respond to this bit, as it’s an excellent question.  We use (Russel 
plug your ears) Slack at my office quite extensively.  One reason we chose 
Slack was because of the “channels”.  We have several based on several topics.  
Two of which are “Fresh Pot” and “Engineering”.   Fresh Pot is centered on 
announcing coffee-related activities, like Regina just put on another pot and 
thank God for her.  There is almost no reason to save the material in here.

“Engineering” is the expected channel.  This is certainly worth saving, it 
became the collected intelligence of when and why certain systems have gone 
down, which ports on the VPN are being opened / closed and a large library of 
code snippets under discussion.  We search the history of that channel 
frequently.  There is plenty of chit-chat on Engineering as well, but it 
doesn’t get in the way when you need to find something.

I am often on the Chapel IRC and I feel there are certainly bits that should be 
preserved.  This would be much more true if there were more people discussing 
code and design.  However, it’s not used very often.  Having the IRC as an 
additional could be extremely useful if (a) it was more populated and (b) the 
internal Chapel team used it more for discussions.  Right now the habit seems 
to be to break out into 1:1, which means no casual listening.

My feeling is that with more use (under our control) and a good search index, 
it would be worth saving.

~~~~~
May All Your Sequences Converge


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Chapel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-users

Reply via email to