I agree, the name "Tacit Definition" is misleading - it is about not using tacit definition. Too late to change this now!
Don Guinn wrote: > Looked at some articles not claimed and pulled up "At Play With J Tacit > Definition", read through it and I couldn't find anything in it about tacit > definitions. It was all about explicit. What am I missing? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
