Brian Schott wrote: > I looked at that one too, and I agree. I have another question about > that article. If you look in the paragraph where Eugene writes, "Tsk > tsk." you will see he is suggesting that the residue function is > tolerant and the fit conjunction must be used to force no tolerance. > The Tsk Tsk seems to be noting that the fit use is not properly > documented in the DOJ. But all of the examples give the same result > even without the zero tolerance forced. > > j602/help/dictionary/d230.htm > > Am I right? The current DOJ entry for residue seems to be oriented > toward augmenting residue to allow for tolerance, not removing > tolerance.
The article was written many years ago. Since then, fit for residue is documented, and we have extended integers and q: . I suggest documenting the new stuff in footnotes, see http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Doc/Articles/Play171 , and perhaps Ian can make any editorial changes in content. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
